The foundations of bioethics.
نویسنده
چکیده
A physician friend of mine recently was caring for a critically ill infant who was dying. The infant's mother insisted that the infant be treated with maximal life support as long as possible. The physician told me that, as a physician, he had the right and the duty to refuse to provide treatment any longer because the effort was `futile'. I pressed him about how he knew he was doing the morally right thing. When I did, he cited the opinion of an American professional physician organization of which he was a member. He seemed to believe that he could prove he was right by citing the moral stand of this group as if it were the definitive authority in biomedical ethics. I pressed him again asking how he knew his group had the right answer. He then claimed that the majority of medical professional organizations in the United States held the same view. I, of course, could ask how he could know that unilaterally withholding care deemed futile was morally right just because the majority of American professional organizations believed it was. And then he might have appealed to some moral consensus of all medical professionals of all time throughout the world. If he did, I still would not have been satisfied. I would have disagreed with him factually. It is clear that not all physicians in history have considered it morally right to unilaterally withhold treatment they deem futile. More critically, I would have disagreed with him epistemologically. I would have disagreed with his implication that one could prove a physician's behavior is morally right by appealing to the consensus of physician opinion. Even if all physicians throughout history have believed some behavior is morally right, that does not make them right. Had he then cited the opinion of a religious group or a national court or the International Court of Justice, I would have been left with the same question: how do we know a position in biomedical ethics is right just because some group or another approves? At this point, ethics desperately searches for a foundation Ð a metaphysical rock-bottom, a grounding or source from whence Bioethics ISSN 0269-9702 Volume 13 Number 3/4 1999
منابع مشابه
Concepts of health and disease: comments on chapter 5 of Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd edition.
Tris Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics stands out in its field for the amount of sustained attention it pays to the epistemological foundations of ethics. Among those working in the field of bioethics, no one has devoted more attention to those foundations, and in particular to the matrix of concepts associated with medical elassification, diagnosis, explanation and treatment. This is t...
متن کاملA feminist interpretation of Engelhardt's bioethics: more a moral friend than a moral stranger.
Is the theory that grounds H. Tristram Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics and the practices it suggests compatible with the theory and practices found in feminist approaches to bioethics? Is The Foundations ofBioethics a work that teaches "that the subordination of women is morally wrong and that the moral experience of women is as worthy of respect as that of men?"' Or is it instead a w...
متن کاملThe moral foundations of health services reform.
I write this criticism of H. Tristram Engelhardt's The Foundations of Bioethics' not fiom the perspective of a philosopher, but fiom that of a physician with a long-time interest in health policy issues as they relate to bioethics. I hold Engelhardt in high regard: among philosophers currently active in bioethics, he is one of the few who are deeply committed to freedom as the primary requireme...
متن کاملThe foundations of bioethics: liberty and life with moral diversity.
For the attention that Rosemarie Tong, James Lennox, Tom Beauchamp, and Robert Sade have given to The Foundations of Bioethics I am very grateful. They have provided a careful and useful exploration of many of the ambiguities of that text. In taking account of their reflections, I will indicate how the text they have examined takes a position somewhat different from what they have assumed in th...
متن کاملRorty's pragmatism and bioethics.
In spite of the routine acknowledgement of Richard Rorty's ubiquitous influence, those who have invoked his name en route to advancing their case for a pragmatist bioethics have not given us a very clear picture of exactly how Rorty's work might actually contribute to methodological discussion in this field. I try to provide such an account here. Given the impressive depth and scope of Rorty's ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Bioethics
دوره 13 3-4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999